Yesterday, in my diary about the scans for "/proxy/" URLs, I noted how attackers are using IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses to possibly obfuscate their attack. These addresses are defined in RFC 4038. These addresses are one of the many transition mechanisms used to retain some backward compatibility as IPv6 is deployed. Many modern applications use IPv6-only networking code. IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses can be used to represent IPv4 addresses in these cases. IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses are not used on the network, but instead, translated to IPv4 before a packet is sent.
To map an IPv4 address into IPv6, the prefix "::ffff:/96" is used. This leaves the last 32 bits to represent the IPv4 address. For example, "10.5.2.1" turns into "::ffff:0a05:0201". Many applications display the last 4 bytes in decimal format to make it easier to read. For example, you will see "::ffff:10.5.2.1".
If IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses can be used depends on the particular application. Here are a few examples, but feel free to experiment yourself:
ping6 on macOS:
% ping6 ::ffff:0a05:0201
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) ::ffff:10.5.2.147 --> ::ffff:10.5.2.1
ping6: sendmsg: Invalid argument
ping6: wrote ::ffff:0a05:0201 16 chars, ret=-1
Note that ping6 displays the IPv4 address in decimal format but refuses to send any packets, since they would be IPv4 packets, not IPv6.
% ping ::ffff:0a05:0201
ping: cannot resolve ::ffff:0a05:0201: Unknown host
Regular IPv4 ping fails to recognize the format for an IP address, and instead interprets it as a hostname, which fails.
ping6 on Linux does not return an error. It just appears to "hang," and no packets are emitted. Running strace shows:
sendto(3, "200{2634i:271i(20062021222324252627"..., 64, 0, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(58), sin6_flowinfo=htonl(0), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::ffff:10.5.2.1", &sin6_addr), sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable)
recvmsg(3, {msg_namelen=28}, MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_ERRQUEUE) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
It attempts to set up an IPv6 connection based on the "AF_INET6" argument in the inet_pton call, but this fails for the mapped IPv4 address.
ssh, on the other hand (on MacOS and Linux) works just fine:
$ ssh ::ffff:0a05:0201 -p 11460
The authenticity of host '[::ffff:10.5.2.1]:11460 ([::ffff:10.5.2.1]:11460)' can't be established.
The traffic is sent properly as IPv4 traffic.
curl is kind of interesting in that it uses the IPv4-mapped IPv6 address as a host header:
$ curl -i http://[::ffff:0a80:010b]
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Server: nginx
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 11:32:10 GMT
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Length: 162
Connection: keep-alive
Location: https://[::ffff:0a80:010b]/
I tried a couple of different web servers, and they all acted the same way. Browsers like Safari and Chrome could also use these addresses. In browsers, it may be possible to evade some filters by using IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses when simple string matching is used. Note how in URLs the IPv6 address must be enclosed in square brackets to avoid "colon confusion".
Any ideas what else to test or how to possibly use or abuse these addresses? Remember that on the network, you will end up with normal IPv4 traffic, not IPv6 traffic using IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses.
—
Johannes B. Ullrich, Ph.D. , Dean of Research, SANS.edu
Twitter|
(c) SANS Internet Storm Center. https://isc.sans.edu Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.
![Differentiating Between a Targeted Intrusion and an Automated Opportunistic Scanning [Guest Diary], (Wed, Mar 4th)](https://www.ironcastle.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/status-2.gif)
